Watched it for free, and it does impress: serious money, a conflict that's properly built. But the context behind the accusations has been wiped.
Watched "Michael" — free, thankfully. Impressive on the whole, which was to be expected. But it plays like a party broadcast: a well-made one, with serious money behind it, and even the central conflict is properly built.
The context behind all the accusations in it has been wiped, sadly — as though none of it ever happened.
Michael Jackson's nephew Jaafar Jackson plays the lead; the biopic set a genre record with $217 million in its opening weekend.
Wikipedia →Elia Suleiman made a film whose hero changes almost nothing — which is exactly what leaves you alone with your own conclusions.

Leos Carax's film, in which the end of the story isn't the end of it — everybody sets their own.
Natalia Kudryashova's film — written in verse, about a city held down by snow, and about whether you're ready to get off the ground.
What did you think of this text?
New texts go out on the Telegram channel — no algorithm, no feed.